Invental/ Experts/ Profile
Code reviewArch. reviewDue diligence

Agent-reliability engineer

Best for: seed startups and small companies putting LLM agents into production; teams whose agent works in demos but fails in production; small businesses automating lead or intake workflows; companies that want their website usable by AI agents..

senior individual contributor
industrial / engineering (client work), HR and recruiting workflows, B2B lead generation
TypeScript, Python, Go, Azure messaging (Service Bus), Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, LLM APIs, LangGraph
Asia-Pacific; async-friendly.
[ M · 01 ]
6
Track-record cases
[ M · 02 ]
6
Scoped reviews you can book with this expert
[ M · 03 ]
4/ 6
Review and architecture services offered
[ M · 04 ]
1
Buyer needs this expert is matched to

§ 01Snapshot

§ 02Services

✓PR/MR code reviewTypeScript / Python / Go, agent and data-pipeline code
✓Architecture reviewagent systems, data pipelines
—Architecture designNot offered by this expert
✓Audit / due diligenceagent reliability, agent-readiness, data quality
✓Vibe-code rescueAI / automation builds
—Team mentoringNot offered by this expert

§ 03Track record

Agents for a production multi-agent workflow platform

A production multi-agent platform automating recruiting workflows has to keep working when a model times out, returns junk, or a downstream system is slow. One of our experts builds agents for this platform with guardrails, retries and fallbacks, on a cloud message-bus architecture.

HR / recruiting workflows · mid-size services companyTypeScript, LLM APIs, Azure Service Bus, Azure SQL, Cosmos DB

End-to-end AI transcription and summarization product with PII protection

A large European engineering group needed AI transcription and summarization, without leaking personal data. Working through a consultancy, one of our experts led the product end to end: speech-to-text, custom PII-detection models, a migration of the backend from PHP to Go, and CI/CD.

industrial / engineering (enterprise client via a consultancy) · large enterpriseGo, PHP (legacy), speech-to-text API, PII detection models, CI/CD

EU-compliant e-invoicing and whistleblower-reporting tools

European companies face mandatory e-invoicing and whistleblower-channel rules. One of our experts built EU-compliant e-invoicing and whistleblower-reporting tools as part of consultancy work for European enterprise clients.

compliance software (enterprise client work) · large enterprisebackend services (PHP / Go era), secure reporting flows

Auditing a live lead pipeline that lost data while every test passed

A pipeline scraping and enriching thousands of businesses twice a day looked healthy: builds green. One of our experts audited it and found a fallback dedup key wrongly merging several hundred distinct businesses, an LLM output limit truncating more than half of enrichment results, a join multiplying a fact table many times over, and a data contract badly undercounting the most valuable leads. They rebuilt it as a medallion lakehouse with grain tests.

B2B lead generation · small businessDelta Lake, DuckDB, dbt, Dagster, LLM enrichment

Fine-tuned small models vs a prompted generalist: a controlled study

Is it worth fine-tuning small models for a classification task? One of our experts ran a controlled study on a single consumer GPU: a prompted mid-size generalist against fine-tuned small language models and a classifier, with thresholds fixed before training, a human gold set, time-based splits and shadow-mode A/B. Outcome: accuracy was a tie, which the report states plainly; fine-tuning bought an order-of-magnitude speedup, deterministic results and fully valid structured output.

B2B lead qualification (applied research) · independent labLoRA fine-tuning, small language models, constrained-output grammars, Python

Lead-acquisition and voice-intake automation for small businesses

Small businesses lose leads to slow follow-up and missed calls. One of our experts builds automation for this: a daily pipeline that delivers qualified prospects each morning, and inbound voice agents that handle intake, booking and reporting, one of them built in under two weeks.

small-business services · small businessn8n, LangGraph, Supabase, local LLMs, voice agents

§ 04What you can book

Multi-agent reliability review

An agent system works in demos but fails unpredictably in production.

Map every model and tool call, check output validation, retry limits, timeouts, fallbacks and guardrails, and look for loops and silent failures.

You get

A failure-path map, a ranked fix list, and suggested evaluation checks to keep it honest.

Architecture review · PR/MR code reviewTypeScript / Python agent frameworks, message queues, LLM APIs

Agent-readiness audit of a website

More traffic will come from AI agents acting for users, and most sites aren't built for them.

Test the site against agent-facing web standards with an inspector tool, check whether agents can discover and call key actions, and compare with similar sites.

You get

A readiness score, a gap list, and the changes that matter most.

Auditagent-facing web standards, inspector tooling, site front end

Business-process automation with a concise proposal

An owner knows a process eats hours but not what automating it would take.

Map the process, pick the steps where automation or an agent pays off, and write a short, few-page proposal with scope, risks and how success will be measured, before building anything.

You get

The proposal, then an automation built on n8n or a code-based agent.

Architecture designn8n, LangGraph, Supabase, LLM APIs

LLM evaluation setup before a model or prompt change

A team changes prompts or models based on vibes.

Build a human-labelled gold set, fix the pass thresholds before testing, use time-based splits, and run changes in shadow mode before switching.

You get

An evaluation harness and a written decision rule for the next change.

Architecture review · AuditPython, evaluation tooling, LLM APIs

PII and GDPR review of an LLM pipeline

Personal data flows into third-party LLMs without a clear record.

Trace where PII enters, check detection and redaction before model calls, look at logging and retention, and consider air-gapped or local models where data can't leave.

You get

A data-flow map, risk list and redaction / audit-layer design.

Audit · Architecture reviewPII detection models, Go or Python audit proxies, local LLMs

Rescue of an automation or agent build that stopped working

A no-code or AI-assisted automation grew piece by piece and now drops records or fails without anyone noticing.

Add monitoring and row-count checks, find where data is silently lost (dedup, truncation, joins), and move the fragile parts to tested code.

You get

A findings list, fixes on the critical path, and basic data-quality tests.

Vibe-code rescue · PR/MR code reviewn8n, Supabase, Postgres, dbt, Python / TypeScript

Questions buyers ask

How do you make a multi-agent LLM system reliable in production?+
Treat each agent call as an unreliable dependency: validate outputs against a schema, add bounded retries, define fallbacks (a simpler model, a rule, or a human), and put guardrails on what agents may do. One of Invental's experts builds agents on a production multi-agent platform and reviews agent systems for exactly these failure paths.
Is fine-tuning a small model better than prompting a bigger one?+
Not always for accuracy. An engineer in Invental's network ran a controlled comparison in which accuracy was a tie, but the fine-tuned small models were far faster, deterministic across runs, and always produced valid structured output. The useful question is which property you need: accuracy, speed, cost or predictability.
How can I tell if my website is ready for AI agents?+
Check it against emerging agent-facing web standards: whether agents can discover what your site offers, call actions in a structured way, and get predictable responses. Invental's network includes an AI engineer who has run these agent-readiness audits on live websites.
Why can a data pipeline pass all its tests and still be wrong?+
Tests often check that models build, not that row counts and keys stay correct. One of Invental's experts audited a live pipeline where builds were green while bad deduplication merged distinct records, truncated LLM outputs dropped data, and a join silently multiplied rows.
— Related experts All experts ↗
founder-CTO / founding product engineer

0→1 founder-CTO for data-heavy SaaS and agent-ready tooling

Best for: solo founders and seed startups building a data or AI product · SaaS teams adding an API or MCP server · developer-tool companies whose CLI or API will be called by AI agents · founders who want product and engineering advice in one person.

Code review, Arch. review +4View profile →
engineering leader and principal-level JavaScript / TypeScript architect

AI-assisted development and JavaScript architecture lead

Best for: teams adopting AI coding agents who want quality to hold · JS/TS scale-ups with growing architecture debt · founders with an AI-built app that needs a senior review · corporate teams training engineers in TDD.

Code review, Arch. review +4View profile →
staff / lead-level full-stack engineer

AI-native staff engineer

Best for: solo founders and seed startups adopting AI coding tools; small SaaS teams preparing for SOC 2 / ISO 27001; teams migrating a Vue front end to Next.js; companies that want juniors coached by someone who teaches..

Code review, Arch. review +4View profile →

How it works

  1. Tell us what you need — the repo or system, the question, and the deadline.
  2. We match an expert from the network, with a second reviewer where it helps.
  3. Scoped work, contracted through Invental — review per pull request, a fixed-scope audit or architecture review, or ongoing capacity.

— Invental · software studio · Montevideo, UY

Want this expert on your code?

Tell us what you are building and what you want checked. We confirm the match and the scope before anything starts.

— Get in touch
hi@invental.co ↗
— Or
— What to include

A link or short description of the code or system, what you want checked, your stack, and when you need the answer. No repository access is needed until scope is agreed.

— Or leave a note
We reply within one business day.